download this page in Adobe Acrobat PDF format here
|
download this page as a MS Word file
here
(If you wish to save it to your hard
drive, right click on the link and choose 'save target as')
Royal Holloway,
Department
of Politics and International Relations
PR 1450 Introduction to Globalization
Taught
by: Chris Rumford and
Overview
The meaning
and causes of globalization are highly contested. Some thinkers hold that it is
the logical outcome of capitalism and the development of world markets, or the
result of information technologies with transformative implications for state,
society and the individual. Others argue that it is the outcome of long-term
processes through which the world has become shaped by certain cultural norms,
or by the diffusion of rational models of societal organization leading to
something akin to a world polity.
The position
taken here is that globalization is best approached as a multi-dimensional
process, or series of processes, which has economic, political, and cultural
dimensions. In most straightforward terms, and bearing in mind the previous
sentence, globalization is best thought of as the increasing interconnectedness
of the world (the world becoming a single place), coupled with the realization
that this is the case. Importantly, this approach to globalization sees it not
simply as an objective process but one with a strong cognitive dimension: our
awareness of the world as a single place is both a consequence of globalization,
and in turn contributes to the process of globalization.
Aims of course:
· To provide an overview of key perspectives in the study of globalization
· To outline the processes contributing to globalization in the contemporary world
· To introduce the range of questions, issues and debates which shape this area of academic inquiry
· To outline ways in which the study of globalization has shaped the social scientific imagination in recent years
· To provide an intellectually stimulating course which will prepare students for a critical engagement with contemporary debates on globalization.
Upon
successful completion of the course students will:
Assessment
Formal assessment will be by unseen examination (3 hours). In addition, students are required to complete three essays of between 1,500 – 2,000 words. For essay topics see page 3 of this document.
Essay
deadlines
NB. Essays must be handed into your seminar leader and submitted electronically via the Turnitin system.
Online resources
Students are encouraged to familiarise themselves with the material available on the following webpages:
Frank Lechner’s Globalization webpage: http://www.emory.edu/SOC/globalization/index.html
Global Transformations:
http://www.polity.co.uk/global/
Chris Rumford’s webpage: http://www.chrisrumford.org.uk/plate_noticeboard.html
Course
outline:
Week
1 Introduction: globalization
– myths and realities
Week
2 Political globalization
Week
3 Economic globalization
Week
4 Cultural globalization
Week
5 Theories of globalization
I: the world as market place
Week
6 Theories of globalization
II: historical perspectives
Week
7 Theories of globalization
III: global interconnectedness
Week
8 Globalization and the nation-state
Week
9 Globalization and democracy
Week
10 Global civil society
Week
11 Globalization and sport
Week
12 Environment and ‘world risk
society’
Week
13 Global terrorism
Week 14 Global
governance
Week
15 Americanization
Week
16 Identity and belonging
Week
17 Globalization and borders
Week
18 Cosmopolitanism
Week
19 Course review
Week
20 Course review
Essential
reading:
Ritzer, G. (ed) 2007: The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. (Blackwell)
Robertson, R. and Scholte, J. (eds) 2007: Encyclopedia of Globalization (Volumes 1-4) (Routledge) 330.903 (oversize)
Scholte, J. A. 2000: Globalization: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave) 330.9 SCH
Held, D. et al 1999: Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Polity) 330.9 GLO
Holton, R. 1998: Globalization and the nation-state.
(Palgrave) 382.1 HOL
Lechner, F. and Boli, J. 2005: World Culture: Origins and Consequences (Blackwell) 301.2
Waters, M. 1995: Globalization. (Routledge) 301.2 WAT
Lechner, F.
and Boli, J. (eds) 2004: The
Globalization Reader (2nd ed) (Blackwell) 330.9 GLO
Dicken P, 2003: Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the C21st (Sage)
338.09 DIC
Essay
questions
Detailed
course content and reading list
Week
1 Introduction: globalization –
myths and realities
What is globalization, and why is it seen as so important in the study of politics and international relations? This introductory lecture will explain what we mean by globalization, what is global about contemporary politics, and how globalization is changing the way we think about politics. The lecture will also dispel some myths about globalization: that it only refers to economic processes, for example, or that it is a recent phenomenon.
Robertson, R. and White, K. 2007: ‘What is
globalization?’ in G. Ritzer (ed) The
Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
Scholte, J. A. 2005: Globalization: A Critical Introduction 2nd Edition . Houndmills: Palgrave (esp. ‘Introduction’, and Part 1) 330.9 SCH
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and
Perraton, J. 1999: Global
Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture.
Robertson, R. 2001: "Globalization
theory 2000+ : major problematics," in G.
Ritzer and B. Smart (eds), Handbook of Social Theory.
Axford, B. 2000: "Globalization,"
in G. Browning, A. Halcli, and F. Webster (eds) Understanding Contemporary
Society.
Robins, K. 1997: “What in the world’s going
on?” in P. du Gay (ed) Production of Culture/Cultures
of Production.
MacGillivray, A.
2006: A Brief History of Globalization.
Stiglitz,
J. 2004: Globalization and Its Discontents. Penguin 338.9 STI
Bhagwati, J. 2004: In Defence of Globalization.
Week
2 Political globalization
Globalization
is best viewed as a complex series of interconnected processes; economic,
social, political, organizational. This
lecture will focus on both the extent to which politics is instrumental in
driving globalization, and the ways in which processes of globalization impact
upon politics. For example, there is much debate on the extent to which the
nation-state retains its primacy in a globalizing world. Do new forms of global
politics exist beyond the realm of conventional international relations?
Delanty, G. and
Rumford, C. 2007: “Political
globalization” in in G. Ritzer (ed) The Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
McGrew, A. 2005:
‘Globalization and global politics’ in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalization of World Politics.
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2003: The Global Transformations Reader: an Introduction to the Globalization
Debate (esp. Part 1)
Lechner, F.
and Boli, J. (eds) 2004: The
Globalization Reader (Second Edition)
Scholte, J. A. 2000: Globalization: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave) (esp. Part 1) 330.9 SCH
Week
3 Economic globalization
It is frequently assumed that globalization is driven by economic forces, and that globalization is synonymous with capitalism. To what extent is this an accurate portrayal of globalization? As students of politics and international relations it will be more productive to develop a multi-dimensional and multi-causal approach to globalization. In doing so we will examine some problems associated with relying upon economistic interpretations of globalization. It will also be necessary to investigate why so many leading theorists of globalization eschew economic explanations (and why others prefer them).
Scholte, J. A. 2000: Globalization: a Critical Introduction 2nd Edition Houndmills: Palgrave (esp. Chapter 5) 327 SCH
Dicken, P. 2007: ‘Economic globalization’
in G. Ritzer (ed) The Blackwell Companion
to Globalization.
Dicken, P. 2004: Global Shift: Re-Shaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st
Century Fourth Edition.
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2003: The Global Transformations Reader: an Introduction to the Globalization
Debate (esp. Part IV)
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2002: Governing
Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance
Lechner, F.
and Boli, J. (eds) 2004: The
Globalization Reader (Second Edition)
Stiglitz,
J. 2004: Globalization and Its Discontents. Penguin 338.9 STI
Bhagwati, J. 2004: In Defence of Globalization.
Week
4 Cultural globalization
Some of the most influential accounts of globalization have emphasised its cultural dimensions, and in particular the emergence of modern forms of global culture (the universality of human rights, or an awareness of the fragility of the natural environment, for example). Contrary to expectations perhaps, the dissemination of cultural norms can be seen as a major driver of globalization, and a key element in the making of the world as a single place.
Tomlinson, J. 2007: ‘Cultural
globalization’ in G. Ritzer (ed) The
Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
Robertson, R 1992: Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture
Lechner, F. and Boli, J. World Culture: Origins and Consequences (esp.
Chapters 1, 2, and 3)
Robertson, R. 2001: "Globalization
theory 2000 :+ major problematics," in G. Ritzer
and B. Smart (eds), Handbook of Social Theory.
Meyer, J.W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., and
Ramirez, F. 2004: “World society and the nation-state” in F. Lechner and J. Boli (eds)
20004: The Globalization Reader
(Second Edition)
Boli, J. and Thomas, G.
2003: ”INGOs and the organization of world culture” in R. Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization: Critical Concepts Vol IV.
Boli, J.
and Thomas, G.M. 1999: Constructing World
Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875 Stanford,
Ca.:
Week
5 Theories of globalization I:
the world as market place
The contemporary preference for seeing the world as a single capitalist system has a significant provenance. Back in the 1970s, World Systems Theory set the agenda for economistic readings of globalization, being founded upon a neo-Marxist attempt to place capitalist expansion in a global context. World Systems Theory attempts to explain both the spread of the capitalist system across the globe (a process which has been in operation for at least five hundred years) and also the major inequalities between the west and the rest.
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2003: The Global Transformations Reader: an Introduction to the
Globalization Debate (esp. Part IV)
Robinson, W. 2007: ‘Theories of
globalization’ in G. Ritzer (ed) The
Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
Wallerstein,
Dicken, P. 2004: Global Shift: Re-Shaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st
Century Fourth Edition.
Wallerstein,
Axford, B. 1995: The Global System: Economics, Politics and Culture.
Chase-Dunn, C. 1999: “Globalization: a world-system perspective” Journal of World-System Reeseach Vol V No 2
http://jwsr.ucr.edu/archive/vol5/number2/html/chase-dunn/index.shtml
Hopkins, T. and Wallerstein,
Lechner, F. and Boli, J. World Culture: Origins and Consequences (esp.
Chapter 2)
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and
Perraton, J. 1999: Global
Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture.
Week 6 Theories of globalization II: historical perspectives
When did globalization begin? Is it a recent phenomenon, or does it have a much longer history? Roland Robertson, one of the leading figures in the development of cultural (ie. non-economistic) interpretations of globalization, has argued that the interconnectedness of the world has developed over a millennium or more. We will focus on Robertson’s historical schema for globalization and compare his approach with that of other theorists who argue that globalization has a long and complex history.
Robertson, R 1992: Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture
Robertson, R. 1990: “Mapping the global
condition,” in M. Featherstone (ed.), Global Culture: Nationalism,
Globalization and Modernity. Sage:
Robertson, R. 2003: The new global history:
history in a global age’ in R.
Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization:
Critical Concepts Vol VI.
Scholte, J. A. 2005: Globalization: A Critical Introduction 2nd Edition . Houndmills: Palgrave (esp. Chapter 3) 330.9 SCH
Holton, R. 2005: Making Globalization. Houndmills: Palgrave (esp. Chapter 2) 338.9 HOL
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and
Perraton, J. 1999: Global
Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture.
MacGillivray, A.
2006: A Brief History of Globalization.
Week
7 Theories of globalization III:
global interconnectedness
Globalization is commonly associated with the rise of ‘network society’, a post-territorial polity founded upon mobilities, flows and increasing (technological) connectivity. Of all the theorists that have appropriated the metaphor of the network the most celebrated is undoubtedly Manuel Castells, whose three volume work The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture has been one of the most influential works of social science (and globalization) in the past decade or so. In addition to Castells we will also examine Appadurai’s influential work on flows and scapes, and Urry’s focus on mobilities.
Castells, M. 2000: The Rise of the Network Society.
Blackwell:
Castells, M. 1998: End of Millennium Blackwell:
Castells, M. 2003: ‘Flows, networks, and
identities: a critical theory of informational society’ in R. Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization: Critical Concepts Vol VI.
Appaduarai, A. 2004:
“Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy” in Boli, J. and Lechner, F. 1999: The Globalization Reader (Second
Edition)
Appadurai, A. 1996: Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.
Urry, J. 2000: Sociology Beyond Societies : Mobilities for
the Next Century.
Urry, J. 2003: “
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/urry-mobile-cultures.pdf
Week
8 Globalization and the
nation-state
Is globalization a threat to the nation-state? Does globalization cause us to re-think some of the basic assumptions upon which international relations is founded? The nation-state has been placed at the centre of many debates on globalization, and the increasing interconnectedness of the world has led many commentators to conclude that sovereignty has been eroded and the role of the nation-state in world affairs undermined. We will examine these arguments, developing the idea that globalization has certainly transformed the role of the nation-state, and we will also consider the possibility that globalization may have in some ways strengthened the nation-state and helped to guarantee its survival in an uncertain world.
Holton,
R. 1998: Globalization and the
Nation-State. Houndmills: Palgrave 382.1 HOL
Axford,
B. 1995: The Global System: Economics,
Politics and Culture. (esp. Chapter
5)
Lechner, F.
and Boli (eds) 2004: The Globalization
Reader (Second Edition)
Arnason, J. 1990: “Nationalism,
globalization and modernity” in M. Featherstone
(ed.) Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity.
Youngs, G. 2003: “International relations
as we enter the twenty-first century” in Kofman, E. and Youngs, G. (eds) Globalization: Theory and Practice.
Halliday, F. 2005:
‘Nationalism’ in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalization of World Politics.
Simai, M. 2003: ‘ The
changing state system and the future of global governance’ in R. Robertson and
K. White (eds) Globalization: Critical
Concepts Vol II.
Week
9 Globalization and democracy
Is globalization a threat to democracy? It is often assumed that it is as many commentators see the nation-state as the ‘natural’ setting for democracy. Nevertheless, it would be a mistake to see the nation-state as an autonomic ‘friend’ of democracy; the nation-state can also be authoritarian and repressive, particularly towards minorities. There is considerable support for the idea that globalization has been responsible for disseminating democratic values; indeed formal democracy is a norm in contemporary nation-states across the world. The role of human rights in this context is significant; are human rights more universal than democratic values? And what is the future for democracy in a ‘post-political’ world?
Scholte, J. A. 2000: Globalization: A Critical Introduction (esp. Ch 11, ‘Globalization and (un)democracy’) Houndmills: Palgrave 327 SCH
Hirst, P.2001: ‘Between the local and the
global: democracy in the C21st’ in R. Axtmann (ed) Balancing Democracy
Barber, B. 2001: ‘Challenges to democracy
in an age of globalization’ in R. Axtmann (ed) Balancing Democracy
Dahl, R. 1999: ‘Can international
organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’ in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds) Democracy’s Edges.
Held, D.
1999: “The transformation of political community: rethinking democracy in the
context of globalization” in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds) Democracy’s Edges.
Lechner, F.
and Boli (eds) 2004: The Globalization
Reader (Second Edition)
Archibugi, D., Held, D. and Kohler, M.
1998: Reimagining Political Community
Beetham,
D. 1999: Democracy and Human Rights
Week
10 Global civil society
Is it meaningful to talk of global civil society? Like democracy, civil society is often seen to belong within a national setting, but at the same time, there has been much interest in recent times in the potential of global civil society to act as a counterbalance to US domination in international affairs and/or to offset the power of global capital. We will examine the arguments for and against the emergence of global civil society and look at its potential in a world beyond (but not without) nation-states.
Kaldor, M:
2003: ‘Global civil society’ in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds) The Global Transformations
Reader: an Introduction to the Globalization Debate
Scholte, J.A. 2003: ‘Global civil society’ in R. Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization: Critical Concepts Vol III.
Baker, G. and
Holton, R. 2005: Making Globalization. Houndmills: Palgrave (esp. Chapter 6) 338.9
HOL
Keane, J. 2003: Global Civil Society?
321.8 KEA
Laxer, G. and Halperin, S. (eds) 2003: Global Civil Society and its Limits. Houndmills: Palgrave
Della Porta, D., Rucht, D., and Kriesi, H.
1999: Social Movements in a Globalizing
World
Williams, M. (2003) “Social movements and
global politics” in E. Kofman and G. Youngs (eds) Globalization: Theory and Practice (2nd Edition)
Boli, J. and Thomas, G. 2004: ‘World culture in the world polity: a century of internal NGOs’ in F. Lechner and J. Boli (eds) The Globalization Reader (Second Edition) 330.9 GLO
Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998: Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks
in International Politics (
Week
11 Globalization and sport
Sport, and in particular world cups and world championships, provides a good example of the ways in which culture can both unite the world and provide evidence of a global consciousness (after all the whole point of a world cup is to be the best in the world, and to recognised as such by the rest of the world). It would appear that truly global sports such as football, tennis and golf provide a means through which the world can be united as a single place (if only for the duration of a competition). Sport has an important relation to globalization and, it can be argued, acts as a motor of transnational cultural exchange.
Andrews, D. and Grainger, A. 2007: ‘Sport
and globalization’ in G. Ritzer (ed) The
Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
Rumford, C. 2007:
‘More than a game: globalization and the postwesternization of world cricket’
in R. Giulianotti and R. Robertson (ed) Globalization and Sport. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Smart, B. 2007: ‘Not playing around: global capitalism, modern sport and consumer culture’ in R. Giulianotti and R. Robertson (ed) Globalization and Sport. Oxford: Blackwell.
Andrews, D. and Ritzer, G. 2007: ‘The grobal in the sporting global’ in R. Giulianotti and R. Robertson (ed) Globalization and Sport. Oxford: Blackwell.
Guiullianotti, R. and Robertson, R. 2007: ‘Recovering the social: globalization, football and transnationalism’ in R. Giulianotti and R. Robertson (ed) Globalization and Sport. Oxford: Blackwell.
Week
12 Environment and ‘world risk society’
It has been argued that we now live in a world risk society. From bird flu to global warming the risks inherent in everyday choices (lifestyle, consumption) we seem to be bombarded with information about risk. Contemporary society seems to be characterised by risk and how it should be managed at both the institutional and personal levels. Importantly, many risks (depletion of the ozone layer, nuclear disasters) are such that they cannot be contained and managed by agencies of one or more nation-states. Thus, the very nature of risk forces us to both recognise the globality of risk society and the need for transnational forms of cooperation in order to reach possible solutions.
Beck, U. 1999: World risk society.
Beck, U. (undated) ‘From Industrial Society to Risk Society: Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment’ www.emayzine.com/infoage/lectures/risk.htm
Beck, U. 1992: Risk society: towards a new modernity.
Beck, U. (undated) ‘Politics of risk society’ www.envsci.nau.edu/sisk/courses/env555/Readings/Beck.PDF
Lupton, D. 1999: Risk
Giddens, A. 1991:
Modernity and Self Identity: Self and
Society in the Late Modern Age (esp.
Chapter 4)
Denney, D. 2005: Risk and Society.
Mythen, G. 2004: Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to Risk Society.
Marshall, B. 2003: ‘Globalization,
environmental degradation and Ulrich Beck’s risk society’ in R. Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization: Critical Concepts Vol V.
Week
13 Global terrorism
The events of 9/11
made it very clear that terrorism is a global threat, a fact which subsequent
terrorist attacks in
Martin, G. 2007: ‘Globalization and international terrorism’ in in G. Ritzer
(ed) The Blackwell Companion to
Globalization.
Devji, F. 2006: ‘Al-Qaeda, spectre of globalisation’ Soundings 32
http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/journals/articles/devji06.html
Scholte, J. A. 2005: Globalization: A Critical Introduction 2nd Edition . Houndmills: Palgrave 330.9 SCH (esp. ‘Chapter 9)
Devji, F. 2005: Landscapes of the Jihad.
Kiras, J. 2005:
‘Terrorism and globalization’ in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalization of World Politics.
Naim, M. 2006: Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers and
Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy.
Della Porta,
D. 2001: ‘Terror against the state’ in K. Nash and A. Scott (eds) The Blackwell Comparison to Political
Sociology.
Rumford, C. 2002: ‘Confronting “Uncivil Society” and the “Dark Side of Globalization”’ www.socresonline.org.uk/6/3/rumford.html
Ritzer, G. 2003: ‘
Appaduarai, A. 2006: Fear of Small Numbers.
Week 14 Global
governance
Do institutions of global governance exist? Is it possible to govern globalization? While the answer the first question is most certainly ‘yes’ (there exist many institutions governing all manner of global economic regimes, regulating communications and technological development, and managing cultural projects), most commentators would be reluctant to endorse the idea that globalization is governable. We will examine the meaning of global governance, its current scope, and the roles played by international institutions, nation-states, NGOs etc. We will also look at the prospects for regimes of global governance and examine whether the governance of globalization is always a good thing.
Scholte, J. A. 2000: Globalization: a Critical Introduction (esp. Chapter 5) Houndmills: Palgrave 327 SCH
Woods, N. 2002: ‘Global governance and the
role of institutions’ in D. Held and A.
McGrew Governing Globalization: Power,
Authority and Global Governance
Koenig-Archibugi,
M. 2002: ‘Mapping global governance’ in D. Held and A. McGrew Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2003: The global transformations reader: an introduction to the
globalization debate (esp. Part IV)
Held, D.
and McGrew, A. 2002: ‘Introduction’ in D. Held and A. McGrew Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance
Scholte,
J.A. (ed) 2002: Civil Society and Global
Finance
Lechner, F.
and Boli, J. (eds) 2004: The
Globalization Reader (Second Edition)
Wilkinson,
R. (ed) 2005: The Global Governance
Reader.
Stiglitz,
J. 2004: Globalization and Its Discontents. Penguin 338.9 STI
Bhagwati, J. 2004: In Defence of Globalization.
Week
15 Americanization
In some versions of globalization theory
globalization is synonymous with Americanization and cultural imperialism. For
other commentators the relationship of
Pieterse, J.N 2003: “Hyperpower
exceptionalism: globalization the American way” in Beck, U., Sznaider, N., and
Winter, R. (eds) 2003: Global
Ritzer, G. 2003: “Assessing McDonaldization, Americanization
and globalization” in Beck, U., Sznaider, N., and Winter, R. (eds) 2003: Global
Ritzer, G. 1998: The McDonaldization Thesis.
Ritzer, G. 2004: The Globalization of
Nothing
Beck, U., Sznaider, N., and Winter, R. (eds)
2003: Global
Falk, R. 2004: The
Declining World Order: America’s Imperial Geopolitics
Week
16 Identity and belonging
For most
of the Twentieth Century social and political identities were defined primarily
by class and/or national belonging, and more recently by gender and ethnicity.
The last couple of decades have seen a proliferation identities and the rise of
‘identity politics’. Rather than being situated by an ‘objective’ class
position, identities are now subjective, multiple, and often the result of
lifestyle choices. We will look at the importance of identity politics,
multiple forms of belonging in the contemporary world, and the impact of
globalization on the politics of identity.
Croucher, S.2004. Globalization and Belonging: the Politics of Identity in a Changing World.
Castells, M. 1997: The Power of Identity
Peterson, V. 2003: ‘The politics of
identification in the context of globalization’ in R. Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization:
Critical Concepts Vol II.
Tomlinson, J. 2003: ‘Globalization and
cultural identity’ in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds) The Global Transformations Reader (Second edition)
Lechner,
F. and Boli, J. World Culture: Origins
and Consequences (esp. Chapter 9)
Beck, U.
2003: ‘Living your own life in a runaway world: individualization,
globalization and politics’ in R.
Robertson and K. White (eds) Globalization:
Critical Concepts Vol IV.
Simson, J. 2003: ‘The
“great reversal”: selves, communities and the global system’ in R. Robertson
and K. White (eds) Globalization:
Critical Concepts Vol IV.
Week 17 Globalization and borders
Some commentators have believed that globalization would lead to a ‘borderless world’ in which national borders become redundant. More realistically, it appears that globalization has in fact led to a world of proliferating borders, particularly in response to the need to counter terrorism and the perceived threat arising from the mobility of immigrants and refuges. It would appear that the needs of economic globalization (open borders, increased mobility) are at odds with the need to increase security. In addition, it is clear that the nature of borders is changing. Borders are increasing diffused through society (found at airports, railway station and along motorways, rather than being at the periphery of the nation-state), and differentiated (what appears as a border to some represents a gateway to others).
Jacobson, D. 2006: ‘Borders’ in Robertson, R. and Scholte, J. (eds) 2007: Encyclopedia of Globalization (Volume 1) (Routledge) 330.903 (oversize)
Balibar, E. 1998: ‘The borders of
Rumford, C. 2006: ‘Borders and bordering’
in G. Delanty (ed) Europe and Asia: Towards a New
Cosmopolitanism
McNeill, D. 2004 New
Andreas, P. 2000: Border games: policing the U.S.-Mexico divide Cornell University Press 364.157 AND
Delanty, G. and Rumford, C. 2005: Rethinking
Week
18 Cosmopolitanism
Cosmopolitanism, an important strand of Enlightenment thinking, has re-emerged in recent years after being eclipsed for more than a century by nationalist thought. Whereas previously cosmopolitanism was associated with (abstract) ideas of world citizenship and universal brotherhood, more recent constructions emphasize the location of the individual within a multiplicity of identities and belongings and membership in a plurality of communities. Thus, in addition to rejection of a narrow nationalistic outlook cosmopolitanism can claim a new political content: the an idea of world citizenship has been given substance through notions of environmental responsibility, the universality of human and personhood rights, and the need for worldwide human development. Thus constituted, cosmopolitanism provides an important perspective on processes of globalization and the interconnectedness of the world.
Rumford, C. (ed) 2007: Cosmopolitanism and Europe.
Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds) 2002: Conceiving Cosmopolitanism.
Beck, U, 2007: ‘Cosmopolitanism: a critical
theory for the C21st’ in G. Ritzer (ed) The
Blackwell Companion to Globalization.
Beck, U. 2002: “Cosmopolitan society and its enemies” Theory Culture and Society 19(1-2)
Beck, U. 2006: Cosmopolitan Vision
Archibugi, D. 2003: Debating Cosmopolitics London: Verso 327 DEB
Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. 1998: Cosmopolitics:
Thinking and Feeling Beyond the
Archibugi, D., Held, D., and Kohler, M.
1998: Re-imagining
political community :studies in cosmopolitan democracy.
Stevenson, N. 2003: Cultural citizenship: cosmopolitan
questions. Buckingham: Open University Press 323.6 STE
Axford, B. and Huggins, R. 2001: "Globalization and the prospects for cosmopolitan world society" http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/vol/cosmopolis/papers/axford.html
Pogge, T.
2002: World Poverty and Human Rights:
Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms
Week
19 Course review
Week
20 Course review
Essay questions
Course Specification 2007/8